Richall Holdings v Fitzwilliam [2013] EWHC 86

Principle: Registered titles can be altered to restore title to the victims of fraudulent transfers.

Mr Fitzwilliam was the owner of the property. When he was in prison, he was approached by one individual who promised to get him out of prison if he could get a loan secured by his property. Mr Fitzwilliam gave him the right to do so but instead of getting a loan, he managed to sell the property without Mr Fitzwilliam’s knowledge.

Held: Fitzwilliam had a better title to the property and could have the register altered in his favour. The primary basis for the decision was a case of Malory, which was the binding authority. In Malory, the court decided that Malory, deprived of its title by deception, was able to sue the registered proprietor, Cheshire, for trespass, because it was the true owner and had a better right to possession.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free Registration introduction text Free Registration introduction text Free Registration introduction text

Our membership includes

Click on icons for previews
Notes icon
Notes
Essays icon
Essays
Tutorial Videos icon
Tutorial Videos
Quizzes icon
Quizzes
Study/Exam Tips icon
Study/Exam Tips
Interactive Learning Platform icon
Interactive Learning Platform
Quiz preview
Interactive Learning PLatform preview